Lockdowns cause mortality spike, not Covid-19
The cat is out of the bag — lockdown measures were the cause of a spike in mortality rates, not Covid-19!
Denis G. Rancourt, by his extensive research* into all-cause mortality figures during Covid-19 in Europe and the USA, has shown “Covid peak” was due to government lockdown actions rather than any novel virus!
Please do remember that next time someone wants to put the whole nation under lockdown. Furthermore, Dr Rancourt's research shows the lockdown measures resulted in “accelerated mass homicide of immune-vulnerable individuals, and individuals made more immune-vulnerable” by government actions. Remember that too, the next time the Government wants to put us all in lockdown to save the vulnerable!
Indeed, the vulnerable were the ones who ultimately paid the price for the insanity of the lockdown; “those who would have died in the next few or more weeks or months can have their deaths accelerated by human intervention, or those who are still recovering from a viral infection can be thrust into more precarious and stressful living conditions.”
This was certainly the case in New Zealand too, where the majority of deaths happened among elderly with multiple health conditions, many in aged-care facilities, some under hospice care.
I highly recommend you read this brilliant research and see how this pandemic was really made and sold to people. If people do not wake up to these facts, we will be subjected to phony “plandemics” again. We owe it to those who died a lonely death, deprived of the love and support of their family and their regular healthcare practitioners, to those whose mental or physical health or livelihoods were adversely affected by the lockdown . . . not to forget the future generations who will bear the economic costs of the lockdown.
Some of the interesting gems in this research paper regarding US statistics were:
' “The ‘Covid peak' in the USA data arises from ‘hot spots', such as New York City.”
' “What is also striking is that some of the largest-population states in the USA, having large numbers of measured and reported cases, and large numbers of individuals with the antibodies, do not show a ‘Covid peak'.” (For example, in California.)
' Furthermore: “. . . none of the seven states that did not impose a lockdown (Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and Arkansas) have a ‘Covid peak'.”
The truth always gets out in the end!
You may ask, and rightly so, how about those computer models** and the epidemiologists who used them to advise our Ministry of Health to put us under lockdown. The answer is simple, just look at their funding sources***, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates wants to vaccinate 7 billion people for Covid-19 and to develop this vaccine, their GAVI organisation (among others) has received millions of dollars from Governments around the world, including $7 million from New Zealand. They will then sell this vaccine, no doubt at huge profit margins, to the same governments!
Albert Einstein: “Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
* All-cause mortality during Covid-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response. Denis G. Rancourt, PhD: www.researchgate.net/publication/341832637_All-cause_mortality_during_COVID-19_No_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response
** Neil Ferguson's Imperial model could be the most devastating software mistake of all time. The boss of a top software firm asks why the Government failed to get a second opinion from a computer scientist: www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2020/05/16/neil-fergusons-imperial-model-could-devastating-software-mistake/
*** The Infection Group Funding: www.otago.ac.nz/infection-group/funding/index.html
Imperial College London:
Footnote from Ed: Denis Rancourt was a professor of physics at the University of Ottawa until 2009, when he was dismissed over alleged “grade inflation” and “academic squatting” (where the topic of a course is arbitrarily changed without departmental permission). He fought his former employer in high-profile cases over the next five years, sometimes successfully, and now promotes himself as an independent social theorist and science critic.