Huge economic benefits if oil was found here

AN “oil rush” could provide economic benefits worth billions here for up to 50 years in the best-case scenario if oil was struck, Gisborne District Council was told.

Progress on a feasibility study of the economic impact of oil and gas exploration in the regions was outlined to the council by Michael Bassett-Foss from economic development agency Business Hawke’s Bay.

Eight regional authorities, including Gisborne District Council and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, are involved in the oil and gas feasibility study covering the economic impact against environmental risk of petroleum exploration in the region.

“We don’t know how much oil and gas there is, which is why they want to drill exploration wells, but we do know that particular rock formations here have got people really excited about the potential to have oil and gas in there,” said Mr Bassett-Foss.

There was still a chance they would find nothing viable but it was still wise to prepare for an “oil rush” — a productive well could be active for between 15 and 50 years in the best-case scenario, he said.

From an initial expenditure of up to $100 million for exploration, the economic input over the 50 years could rise as high as $255 billion if there was full-scale production.

He did not think there would be any employment opportunities for local people during the exploration phase, because companies usually brought in their own skilled workers for that.

But there could be work opportunities if the exploration was successful and the oil companies drilled, he said.

Deputy Mayor Nona Aston wanted to know if there was any talk about apprenticeship opportunities to start training locals to work on the rig.

Mr Bassett-Foss said he had not heard anything but it would be premature to train people before they knew if there were going to be jobs for them.

Manu Caddie said there was a moral issue with fossil fuel mining, especially with climate change staring us in the face.

“Just because we can do it, should we do it or should we be putting energy into focusing on renewable energy?”

Graeme Thomson said a joint approach from the regions was needed to reinforce the burden to ratepayers and the impact on local infrastructure.

■ A consultation document on the Government’s proposed onshore and offshore blocks for competitive tender for petroleum exploration permits in 2013 was presented to the council.

A response will be prepared by council staff, for presentation at the January meeting.

Comments
Peter Jones
05:17 p.m. Sunday, Dec 02, 2012
A proper response would be to impose a 10-year ban on all exploration. The opportunity will not go away.
In 10 years they may have either refined the fracking process - making it cheaper, safer and more effective - or proven once and for all whether fracking is harmful to the environment, thereby saving us from potential harm.
As the cost of oil rises, these resources will face more demand and our unexplored resource will grow in scarcity and value.
By then New Zealand could have set up a refinery on a local scale, thereby insulating the country from import difficulty and keeping the profits and the oil for our own benefit instead of the Apaches.
Bob Hughes
04:38 p.m. Saturday, Dec 01, 2012
How strange the timing -- that an article like this should emerge as climate talks are proceeding in Doha.
The world seeks a way to curb greenhouse emissions?
Which is it? Hypocritical, or cognitive-disconance thinking? Maybe both.
That ongoing fossil fuel use has led to the dicey situation the world now faces is undisputable.
Emissions damage eco systems, seas, land and the climate by loading our atmosphere and oceans with CO2 and other bad stuff.
I need not repeat the bigger list.
Why are the climate talks proceeding in Qatar this moment?
Forget huge economic benefits -- the world is now in survival mode!
Wealth from fossil fuels won't fix anything.
I agree with Manu Caddie (“This is a moral issue”).
Let's fight to maintain our lands, water and air's ability to support us and all that live on the planet.
This can't be done by extracting the remaining hard-to-get oil and other fossil fuels from below; especially with the more eco-unfriendly modern methods in use.
Fossil fuels are finite. If our district is to survive when all has gone, we need to have healthy eco-systems.
Is it worth long-term degradation of land, water and air for a short-term economic gain?
Any assault on our lands or ocean floor of this nature is ecocide!
Consider the future generations not yet born -- what we do now affects them.

Bob Hughes

Poll

Do you agree with a bid to pull bridge jumpers away from unsafe road bridges in the city by building “bombing platforms” for youngsters in safe places along the Turanganui River?

Please read: Call for ‘bombing platforms’

Yes
No
Don't Know
64 Gladstone Road, PO Box 1143, Gisborne, New Zealand | Ph: +64 6 869 0600 | Fax: +64 6 869 0643 (editorial) | Fax: +64 6 869 0644 (advertising) | News Hotline: 0800 NEWSLINE (639 754) | info@gisborneherald.co.nz Copyright © The Gisborne Herald